Re: where can i download pgs 7.3.x ?

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.

ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/

Sorry for the typo. It should be:

ftp.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql/source/

You could also check the nearest mirror to you:

http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors-ftp.html

Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.

ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/

Sorry for the typo. It should be:

ftp.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql/source/

You could also check the nearest mirror to you:

http://www.postgresql.org/mirrors-ftp.html

Regards,

Finally I get it ;) !

Thx for all

Geoffrey

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 19:05:58 +0300,
Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Geoffrey KRETZ wrote:

For the purpose of QA testing, I need a 7.3.X version of postgreSQL for
unix (linux i686) but I can't find it on the postgre website.

ftp.postgresql.org/postgresql/source/

7.3.6 is the latest one on 7.3 branch.

On (at least) ftp.postgresql.org the URL should be:
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.3.6/

P.S. The original request was posted as a reply to another thread. This
is not a nice thing to do. It messes up the archives and can hide the
fact that your request is new, causing some people who could have helped you
to ignore it.

P.S. The original request was posted as a reply to another thread. This
is not a nice thing to do. It messes up the archives and can hide the
fact that your request is new, causing some people who could have helped you
to ignore it.

I'm sorry for that, I don't mind to bother anyone (I've just reply to a
random message and change the subject and the recipient).

I apologize for any inconvenience it could have done.

So, if I want to post a new message I should not use "reply" but wrtie
an all new mail, is that right ?

Geoffrey

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 18:31:05 +0200,
Geoffrey KRETZ <gk@4js.com> wrote:

So, if I want to post a new message I should not use "reply" but wrtie
an all new mail, is that right ?

Correct.