beta3 packaged ...

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:

Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
announcing ...

Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
dialup connection ...

regards, tom lane

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:

Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
announcing ...

Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
dialup connection ...

'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...

Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:

Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
announcing ...

Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
dialup connection ...

'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...

Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?

Yes. If we din't need an initdb, we may have just skipped beta3 and
jumped right to RC1 next Friday.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:

Please check it and confirm ... I believe everything, includin the docs,
should be right on this ... if not, I'm going to repackage before
announcing ...

Code looks good from here, can't check the docs very easily over this
dialup connection ...

'K, if I haven't heard anything negative by the time I'm finished the
server upgrade this evening, I'll put out an announce ...

Just need to confirm, beta3 *does* require an initdb from beta2, right?

Yes. If we din't need an initdb, we may have just skipped beta3 and
jumped right to RC1 next Friday.

With the amount of chnages that went in between beta2 and no, there is no
way that an RC1 would go out without a beta3 :)