Filter:

Messages on June 09, 2020

Threads19 messages
7Started
2Replied in own
10Replied to othersin 8 threads
Patchesof which 1 carried a patch
1New patchfirst in its thread
0Follow-uprevision of an earlier one
ActivityThreadSent
Replied (other)elog(DEBUG2 in SpinLocked section.about 6 years ago
Replied (other)Atomic operations within spinlocksabout 6 years ago
Replied (other)Atomic operations within spinlocksabout 6 years ago
Replied (other)Why is pq_begintypsend so slow?about 6 years ago
Replied (other)Postmaster Crashing - Postgres 11 when JIT is enabledabout 6 years ago
Replied (other)Bump default wal_level to logicalabout 6 years ago
Replied (other)Physical replication slot advance is not persistentabout 6 years ago
Replied (own)Add -Wold-style-definition to CFLAGS?about 6 years ago
Replied (other)First patchAtomic operations within spinlocksabout 6 years ago
Replied (own)Add -Wold-style-definition to CFLAGS?about 6 years ago
Replied (other)valgrind versus pg_atomic_init()about 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Started threadpgsql: Avoid need for valgrind suppressions for pg_atomic_init_u64 on sabout 6 years ago
Replied (other)Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolationabout 6 years ago