Messages in week 42 (Oct 08 - Oct 14, 2012)
11 messages1 started threads3 replied (own)7 replied (other)3 other threads0 first patch0 follow-up patch
| Activity | Thread | Sent |
|---|---|---|
| Replied (other) | Truncate if exists | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Deprecating RULES | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Deprecating RULES | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Deprecating RULES | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Deprecating RULES | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (other) | [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (other) | [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ? | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ? | over 13 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ? | over 13 years ago |
| Started thread | Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ? | over 13 years ago |