| Started threadFirst patch | Confusing behavior of create table like | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (other) | [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (other) | [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Why it is not possible to create custom AM which behaves similar to btree? | about 6 years ago |
| Started thread | Why it is not possible to create custom AM which behaves similar to btree? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own)Follow-up patch | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #16535: Implementing Autonomous Transactions in Postgresql | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own)First patch | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Started thread | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Persist MVCC forever - retain history | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Built-in connection pooler | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Persist MVCC forever - retain history | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own)Follow-up patch | Built-in connection pooler | about 6 years ago |
| Replied (own)Follow-up patch | Built-in connection pooler | about 6 years ago |