| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation | almost 10 years ago |
| Started thread | Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | fixes for the Danish locale | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | fixes for the Danish locale | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | fixes for the Danish locale | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | fixes for the Danish locale | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Improving executor performance | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | rethinking dense_alloc (HashJoin) as a memory context | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | [PROPOSAL] timestamp informations to pg_stat_statements | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | [PROPOSAL] timestamp informations to pg_stat_statements | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Obsolete comment within fmgr.c | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other)First patch | BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Improving executor performance | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Improving executor performance | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Database Architect - Voleon Capital Management LP | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14231: logical replication wal sender process spins when using error traps in function | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | rethinking dense_alloc (HashJoin) as a memory context | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | UPSERT/RETURNING -> ON CONFLICT SELECT? | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14245: Segfault on weird to_tsquery | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Upsert with a partial unique index constraint violation | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14210: filter by "=" constraint doesn't work when hash index is present on a column | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | remove checkpoint_warning | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Pg_upgrade and collation | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | \timing interval | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own)Follow-up patch | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | MVCC overheads | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | \timing interval | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other)Follow-up patch | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14231: logical replication wal sender process spins when using error traps in function | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14231: logical replication wal sender process spins when using error traps in function | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Too slow "Analyze" for the table with data in Thai language | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Parallel query and temp_file_limit | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Parallel query and temp_file_limit | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Parallel query and temp_file_limit | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | "insert [...] on conflict" hangs on conflict on an unmentioned gist index | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | _mdfd_getseg can be expensive | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Bug in batch tuplesort memory CLUSTER case (9.6 only) | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | _mdfd_getseg can be expensive | almost 10 years ago |
| Replied (other) | _mdfd_getseg can be expensive | almost 10 years ago |