Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests for copy command..

Started by Ayush Parasharover 20 years ago10 messages
#1Ayush Parashar
aparashar@greenplum.com
2 attachment(s)

Hi there,

I am new to this list.

I have made some additions to multi-byte regression tests ( ./src/test/mb),
to include regression tests for copy command. This can be used to test
multi-byte extensions of postgresql and client character encoding, for copy
command. The test uses the following complete character sets: "big5 gbk uhc
gb18030 euc_cn latin8 iso_8859_6 iso_8859_7 euc_kr euc_jp".

I am attaching only the modified README and mbregress.sh with the email. I
have not included the various character sets with the email as they are
nearly 1MB.

Can you please comment on this..?

I can provide a patch for the same, which includes the character sets.

Thanks,
Ayush

ps: sorry for the previous blank email, that was by mistake.

Attachments:

READMEapplication/octet-stream; name=READMEDownload
mbregress.shapplication/octet-stream; name=mbregress.shDownload
#2Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Ayush Parashar (#1)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests for

Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ayush Parashar wrote:

Hi there,

I am new to this list.

I have made some additions to multi-byte regression tests ( ./src/test/mb),
to include regression tests for copy command. This can be used to test
multi-byte extensions of postgresql and client character encoding, for copy
command. The test uses the following complete character sets: "big5 gbk uhc
gb18030 euc_cn latin8 iso_8859_6 iso_8859_7 euc_kr euc_jp".

I am attaching only the modified README and mbregress.sh with the email. I
have not included the various character sets with the email as they are
nearly 1MB.

Can you please comment on this..?

I can provide a patch for the same, which includes the character sets.

Thanks,
Ayush

ps: sorry for the previous blank email, that was by mistake.

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests for

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?

Adding an MB to the distribution for tests that hardly anyone needs to
run is surely not a good idea. What about putting them on pgfoundry and
then putting a link to that somewhere in the docs?

regards, tom lane

#4Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#3)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests for

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?

Adding an MB to the distribution for tests that hardly anyone needs to
run is surely not a good idea. What about putting them on pgfoundry and
then putting a link to that somewhere in the docs?

Yea, that sounds good.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#5Andrew Dunstan
andrew@dunslane.net
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#4)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding tests

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Where are we on this? Should we just add a URL to the full 1MB test files?

Adding an MB to the distribution for tests that hardly anyone needs to
run is surely not a good idea. What about putting them on pgfoundry and
then putting a link to that somewhere in the docs?

Yea, that sounds good.

The running of extra tests outside our standard regression set will be
one of the topics discussed during my session in Toronto. I don't mind
having them stored elsewhere, although it will make things a bit more
complex, but this use should be kept in mind (for example, I don't think
pgfoundry has a CVSup server, although it probably could have easily
enough).

cheers

andrew

#6Luke Lonergan
llonergan@greenplum.com
In reply to: Andrew Dunstan (#5)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding

Bruce, Tom, Andrew,

On 6/14/06 11:06 AM, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

The running of extra tests outside our standard regression set will be
one of the topics discussed during my session in Toronto. I don't mind
having them stored elsewhere, although it will make things a bit more
complex, but this use should be kept in mind (for example, I don't think
pgfoundry has a CVSup server, although it probably could have easily
enough).

Ayush and I (along with Brian Hagenbuch) also plan to be in Toronto, so we
can help as needed.

- Luke

#7Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Luke Lonergan (#6)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding

Luke,

Ayush and I (along with Brian Hagenbuch) also plan to be in Toronto, so
we can help as needed.

You and Bruce might want to think about *registering* for the conference.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

#8Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#7)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding

Josh Berkus wrote:

Luke,

Ayush and I (along with Brian Hagenbuch) also plan to be in Toronto, so
we can help as needed.

You and Bruce might want to think about *registering* for the conference.

I thought I did already. I filled something out a few months ago.
Anyway, it now says registration closed.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#9Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Josh Berkus (#7)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

You and Bruce might want to think about *registering* for the conference.

Speaking of which, is a list of those registered posted anywhere? I
looked for one the other day because I wanted to double-check that
I was registered, but couldn't find anything on the website.

regards, tom lane

#10Josh Berkus
josh@agliodbs.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#9)
Re: Multi-byte and client side character encoding

Tom,

Speaking of which, is a list of those registered posted anywhere? I
looked for one the other day because I wanted to double-check that
I was registered, but couldn't find anything on the website.

No, I think there would be some privacy issues with that. You're
registered. You should have been getting "conference-attendees" e-mails,
about 3 of them so far.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco