pgsql: Revert fd2ace802811c333b0b4e1a28b138fd4774745f3
Revert fd2ace802811c333b0b4e1a28b138fd4774745f3
Seems we want to document '=' plpgsql assignment instead.
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d84c584ece6d882c3a45cacd056ca8635e963996
Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
On 01/11/2014 02:01 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Revert fd2ace802811c333b0b4e1a28b138fd4774745f3
Seems we want to document '=' plpgsql assignment instead.
It's less than best practice, IMNSHO, and if it's documented I'd prefer
it to be noted that it's deprecated and inconsistent with the upstream
languages.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
On 01/11/2014 02:01 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Seems we want to document '=' plpgsql assignment instead.
It's less than best practice, IMNSHO, and if it's documented I'd prefer
it to be noted that it's deprecated and inconsistent with the upstream
languages.
Well, as was noted in the other thread, that all depends on which
languages you think are "upstream" --- SQL itself, and SQL/PSM, do
not use ":=". I'm fine with saying that := is the preferred spelling,
but I think that calling "=" deprecated is overstating the case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers