[Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to Make failure]
hold the presses...
Narwhal just broke :-(
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK
to Make failure
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:23:06 -0800 (PST)
From: PG Build Farm <pgbuildfarm-web@hosting-two.commandprompt.com>
To: pgbuildfarm-status-chngs@pgfoundry.org,
pgbuildfarm-status-green@pgfoundry.org
The PGBuildfarm member narwhal had the following event on branch HEAD:
Status changed from OK to Make failure
The snapshot timestamp for the build that triggered this notification
is: 2007-11-15 21:00:00
The specs of this machine are:
OS: Windows Server 2003 R2 / 5.2.3790
Arch: i686
Comp: GCC / 3.4.2 (mingw-special)
For more information, see
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=narwhal&br=HEAD
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
hold the presses...
Narwhal just broke :-(
Grumble ... looks like we have to use ftruncate to keep Windows
happy. Will fix.
regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Let me know when ready to proceed ...
- --On Thursday, November 15, 2007 16:30:00 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
hold the presses...
Narwhal just broke :-(Grumble ... looks like we have to use ftruncate to keep Windows
happy. Will fix.regards, tom lane
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHPOy/4QvfyHIvDvMRAvp8AJ99cHVDw0p3Nwq1vlQsYGDMbGPOrgCfXBUH
gtfoN8cw8oKLiFnWN5kMOuQ=
=3FXh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
Let me know when ready to proceed ...
I just fixed a second bug in that patch :-(
But I think we're good to go now.
Note that none of the version-stamping has been done yet.
Also, I'm not sure where Bruce is with his pgindent stuff.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
Let me know when ready to proceed ...
I just fixed a second bug in that patch :-(
But I think we're good to go now.
Note that none of the version-stamping has been done yet.
Right, I believe only Marc does that. I have never touched it for beta.
Also, I'm not sure where Bruce is with his pgindent stuff.
I am done with pgindent, thanks. I was even able to pgindent files I
had to skip in the past.
Should we wait longer for the buildfarm to become more green?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, November 15, 2007 20:23:30 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Should we wait longer for the buildfarm to become more green?
Any idea on how often narwhal will do a build? are we talking 24hr to wait to
see if it goes green?:)
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHPPHa4QvfyHIvDvMRAjPmAJ9vvi+1Z3SpDR9rzVC4Bz6Jqz8s3QCfTGpT
bmr7aMXrwWpCVPFX92+4Gh8=
=0rDF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:26 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Any idea on how often narwhal will do a build?
It looks that it builds -HEAD every 6 hours:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=narwhal&br=HEAD
and the next build is 2 hours later.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
'k, then I'd say let's wait ... I'll aim for 00:00 AST to do the build, which
gives ~2.25hrs from now, which should be loads of time, right?
- --On Thursday, November 15, 2007 17:35:32 -0800 Devrim GÜNDÜZ
<devrim@CommandPrompt.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:26 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Any idea on how often narwhal will do a build?
It looks that it builds -HEAD every 6 hours:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=narwhal&br=HEAD
and the next build is 2 hours later.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHPPa/4QvfyHIvDvMRAheAAKCJrdG0kuJO+yS/kx2DqrUrUTpJcACgxdKg
lcw0W1Fon15eZu/gfpEPsRI=
=KOkj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:26 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Any idea on how often narwhal will do a build?
It looks that it builds -HEAD every 6 hours:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=narwhal&br=HEAD
and the next build is 2 hours later.
Yeah. Theoretically we should be OK because we have a couple of
green results from MSVC animals, but I wouldn't mind waiting two
hours to see one from a Windows/gcc build.
I already asked Dave if he could force a rebuild from home, no go :-(
regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:48:38 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:26 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Any idea on how often narwhal will do a build?
It looks that it builds -HEAD every 6 hours:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=narwhal&br=HEAD
and the next build is 2 hours later.Yeah. Theoretically we should be OK because we have a couple of
green results from MSVC animals, but I wouldn't mind waiting two
hours to see one from a Windows/gcc build.I already asked Dave if he could force a rebuild from home, no go :-(
Since we are waiting anyway, something I brought up to Dave about this
exact problem was the idea of a "freeze" :). E.g; All animals must go
green and stay green with zero additional commits for 24 hours before
we wrap.
Is that something that sounds reasonable?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading
through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command
to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to
the mailing list cleanly
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPPiGATb/zqfZUUQRAry+AKCoKCGcJ4+E4B0sDKNe/2KJ3bzf2wCeJNCA
O2OLZTBmw/rpk/TH/ZC6vlQ=
=kzfS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tom Lane wrote:
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:26 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Any idea on how often narwhal will do a build?
It looks that it builds -HEAD every 6 hours:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=narwhal&br=HEAD
and the next build is 2 hours later.Yeah. Theoretically we should be OK because we have a couple of
green results from MSVC animals, but I wouldn't mind waiting two
hours to see one from a Windows/gcc build.I already asked Dave if he could force a rebuild from home, no go :-(
I will force one in a few minutes.
cheers
andrew
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
Since we are waiting anyway, something I brought up to Dave about this
exact problem was the idea of a "freeze" :). E.g; All animals must go
green and stay green with zero additional commits for 24 hours before
we wrap.
Is that something that sounds reasonable?
Sounds like a good way to waste a day. Even more likely, people would
hold off fixing problems till after a beta, because it would reset the
counter; and then commit the changes later, guaranteeing that they'd get
*less* testing.
That's not even mentioning the problem that animals fail on a near-daily
basis for reasons beyond our control.
I'm not in favor of arbitrary rules. The buildfarm is a tool to serve
us, not vice versa.
regards, tom lane
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I already asked Dave if he could force a rebuild from home, no go :-(
I will force one in a few minutes.
narwhal and dawn_bat are both showing green, so I think we're ready to
wrap at Marc's convenience.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I already asked Dave if he could force a rebuild from home, no go :-(
I will force one in a few minutes.
narwhal and dawn_bat are both showing green, so I think we're ready to
wrap at Marc's convenience.
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +