pgbench patches
Hi Fabien,
I have looked into this:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1105
because it's marked as "Ready for committer". However I noticed that
you worried about other pgbench patches such as
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1103 .
So I would like to know whether the throttling patch is committed and
then update the progress patch to take that into account.
Shall I wait for your pgbench --throttle patch becomes ready for committer?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Hello Tatsuo,
I have looked into this:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1105
because it's marked as "Ready for committer". However I noticed that
you worried about other pgbench patches such as
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1103 .So I would like to know whether the throttling patch is committed and
then update the progress patch to take that into account.Shall I wait for your pgbench --throttle patch becomes ready for committer?
No. I'll submit another patch to the next commitfest to improve the
progress behavior under throttling, if & when both initial patches are
committed.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Hello Tatsuo,
I have looked into this:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1105
because it's marked as "Ready for committer". However I noticed that
you worried about other pgbench patches such as
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1103 .So I would like to know whether the throttling patch is committed and
then update the progress patch to take that into account.Shall I wait for your pgbench --throttle patch becomes ready for
committer?No. I'll submit another patch to the next commitfest to improve the
progress behavior under throttling, if & when both initial patches are
committed.
Ok, so I looked into the progress patch. One thing I noticed was:
case 'P':
progress = atoi(optarg);
if (progress <= 0)
{
fprintf(stderr,
"thread progress delay (-P) must not be negative (%s)\n",
optarg);
exit(1);
}
break;
For me, the error message is not quite right, because progress == 0
case is considered error as well in your patch. I sugges you change
the error message something like:
"thread progress delay (-P) must be positive number (%s)\n",
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Hello Tatsuo,
For me, the error message is not quite right, because progress == 0
case is considered error as well in your patch. I sugges you change
the error message something like:"thread progress delay (-P) must be positive number (%s)\n",
Please find attached a new version with an updated message.
--
Fabien.
Attachments:
pgbench-progress-v7.patchtext/x-diff; name=pgbench-progress-v7.patchDownload+94-2
Hello Tatsuo,
For me, the error message is not quite right, because progress == 0
case is considered error as well in your patch. I sugges you change
the error message something like:"thread progress delay (-P) must be positive number (%s)\n",
Please find attached a new version with an updated message.
Thanks. I've been testing on Linux now. Starting from coming Tuesday
(Monday is a national holiday in Japan) I will test on Mac OS X and
Windows.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Hello Tatsuo,
For me, the error message is not quite right, because progress == 0
case is considered error as well in your patch. I sugges you change
the error message something like:"thread progress delay (-P) must be positive number (%s)\n",
Please find attached a new version with an updated message.
Thanks. I've been testing on Linux now. Starting from coming Tuesday
(Monday is a national holiday in Japan) I will test on Mac OS X and
Windows.
I have done the test on Mac OS X. Windows testing was done by my
coleague, Yugo Nagata. The results were very positive and I committed
--progress patches.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers