BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Started by Lionel Boutonabout 21 years ago8 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1Lionel Bouton
lionel-subscription@bouton.name

The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference: 1588
Logged by: Lionel Bouton
Email address: lionel-subscription@bouton.name
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
Operating system: Linux 2.6, glibc 2.3.4
Description: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow
Details:

pg_autovacuum doesn't sleep when the -s parameter is set above 2147
(PostgreSQL then is under constant stress), seems like a 32-bit signed
integer overflow (the time in µs then gets past 2^31-1) somewhere.

This worked with 7.4.6 (at least with -s 3600).

#2Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Lionel Bouton (#1)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Lionel Bouton wrote:

The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference: 1588
Logged by: Lionel Bouton
Email address: lionel-subscription@bouton.name
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
Operating system: Linux 2.6, glibc 2.3.4
Description: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow
Details:

pg_autovacuum doesn't sleep when the -s parameter is set above 2147
(PostgreSQL then is under constant stress), seems like a 32-bit signed
integer overflow (the time in ��s then gets past 2^31-1) somewhere.

This worked with 7.4.6 (at least with -s 3600).

Yes, this is a bug. Right now, pg_autovacuum uses pg_usleep(), which
accepts a 'long' value representing the number of microseconds to sleep.
Because long is 32-bits on many platforms, it overflows around 2 billion
microseconds, which is 2147 seconds. The comment in pg_usleep()
verifies it:

* On machines where "long" is 32 bits, the maximum delay is ~2000 seconds.

Here is a proposed patch that will fix it. There is no reason to use
pg_usleep in pg_autovacuum in this area, so we just use sleep(). We
don't need micro-second accuracy, and we don't need Win32 to handle
signals that arrive during the sleep.

However, I am now wondering if we should change pg_usleep() to take a
double rather than long. This would avoid such problems in the future
in other places in our code.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachments:

/bjm/difftext/plainDownload+11-11
#3Andrew Dunstan
andrew@dunslane.net
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Bruce Momjian wrote:

*/
! #ifndef WIN32
! sleep(sleep_secs); /* Unix sleep is seconds */
! #else
! sleep(sleep_secs * 1000); /* Win32 sleep() is milliseconds */

Shouldn't the be Sleep with a capital S? see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/sleep.asp

cheers

andrew

#4Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Andrew Dunstan (#3)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

Bruce Momjian wrote:

*/
! #ifndef WIN32
! sleep(sleep_secs); /* Unix sleep is seconds */
! #else
! sleep(sleep_secs * 1000); /* Win32 sleep() is milliseconds */

Shouldn't the be Sleep with a capital S? see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/sleep.asp

I was wondering about that, so I compiled it with MinGW and sleep()
worked fine, so I stuck with that. In fact, I just tried Sleep() and
that didn't work. It said:

C:/DOCUME~1/BRUCEM~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccMLbaaa.o(.text+0x27):x.c: undefined
reference to `Sleep'

Maybe if I added some includes it would work, but sleep() seemed safest.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#5Andrew Dunstan
andrew@dunslane.net
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#4)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

Bruce Momjian wrote:

*/
! #ifndef WIN32
! sleep(sleep_secs); /* Unix sleep is seconds */
! #else
! sleep(sleep_secs * 1000); /* Win32 sleep() is milliseconds */

Shouldn't the be Sleep with a capital S? see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/sleep.asp

I was wondering about that, so I compiled it with MinGW and sleep()
worked fine, so I stuck with that. In fact, I just tried Sleep() and
that didn't work. It said:

C:/DOCUME~1/BRUCEM~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccMLbaaa.o(.text+0x27):x.c: undefined
reference to `Sleep'

Maybe if I added some includes it would work, but sleep() seemed safest.

Strange ... as long as you #include <windows.h> it should be fine, and
pg_autovacuum.c already does include it.

Anyway, whatever works, I guess.

cheers

andrew

#6Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

However, I am now wondering if we should change pg_usleep() to take a
double rather than long. This would avoid such problems in the future
in other places in our code.

I'd leave it alone; there aren't any other places that need long sleeps,
and I don't really expect them. When and if we have a real need for it,
we can change it.

regards, tom lane

#7Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Andrew Dunstan (#5)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

Strange ... as long as you #include <windows.h> it should be fine, and
pg_autovacuum.c already does include it.

Anyway, whatever works, I guess.

Ah, my test program did not include "windows.h". I found it understood
sleep() with just the standard Unix includes. I did not test compiling
pg_autovacuum itself.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
#8Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Patch applied and backpatched to 8.0.X.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Index: contrib/pg_autovacuum/pg_autovacuum.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/contrib/pg_autovacuum/pg_autovacuum.c,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -c -c -r1.31 pg_autovacuum.c
*** contrib/pg_autovacuum/pg_autovacuum.c	19 Apr 2005 03:35:15 -0000	1.31
--- contrib/pg_autovacuum/pg_autovacuum.c	11 May 2005 14:43:34 -0000
***************
*** 1749,1755 ****
fflush(LOGOUTPUT);
}

! pg_usleep(sleep_secs * 1000000); /* Larger Pause between outer loops */

gettimeofday(&then, 0); /* Reset time counter */

--- 1749,1764 ----
fflush(LOGOUTPUT);
}

! /* Larger Pause between outer loops */
! /*
! * pg_usleep() is wrong here because its maximum is ~2000 seconds,
! * and we don't need signal interruptability on Win32 here.
! */
! #ifndef WIN32
! sleep(sleep_secs); /* Unix sleep is seconds */
! #else
! sleep(sleep_secs * 1000); /* Win32 sleep() is milliseconds */
! #endif

gettimeofday(&then, 0); /* Reset time counter */

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073