Small typo in func.sgml

Started by Tatsuo Ishiialmost 7 years ago3 messagesdocs
Beta feature

Hackorum builds and tests every patch posted to the lists, not only commitfest submissions. This is Hackorum's own CI rather than the PostgreSQL project's, and it is still under testing - please report anything that looks wrong.

won't retrysuccessCI history

You can run a PostgreSQL built from this patch straight from Docker, with no checkout and no build:

docker run --rm -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/hackorum-dev/postgres-patch:t76593
psql -h localhost -U postgres

Built from patchset v1 (message #1), July 28, 2026 at 03:30 AM.

Every patchset is also pushed to a branch of our PostgreSQL fork, so you can check out the same tree CI built. Without a PostgreSQL checkout:

git clone --branch t76593_1 https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

In a checkout you already have, add the fork once:

git remote add hackorum https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

then, for this patchset and every later one:

git fetch hackorum t76593_1 && git checkout t76593_1

Patchset v1 (message #1) is on t76593_1

Jump to latest
#1Tatsuo Ishii
ishii@postgresql.org

I thinkk a new line is needed after <para>.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

Attachments:

t76593_1
func.difftext/x-patch; charset=us-asciiDownload+2-1
#2Michael Paquier
michael@paquier.xyz
In reply to: Tatsuo Ishii (#1)
Re: Small typo in func.sgml

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 08:16:15AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

I think a new line is needed after <para>.

True that it is the usual pattern.
--
Michael

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Tatsuo Ishii (#1)
Re: Small typo in func.sgml

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes:

I thinkk a new line is needed after <para>.

-  <para>JSON query functions and operators
+  <para>
+   JSON query functions and operators

It doesn't really make any difference, I believe. I agree it's
neater with the newline, but I wouldn't bother changing it unless
you're making some other nearby change.

(There are actually instances of this in quite a few places in
our docs, if memory serves. I think somebody uses, or used,
an editor that tended to remove newlines in that context.)

regards, tom lane