High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix
In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row
for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need
conflict resolution.
Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this"
means "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution") This used to be true
long time ago but current stable versions of Pgpool-II do not support
this any more.
Attached patch fixes these.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Oops. Forgot to attach the patch.
Show quoted text
In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row
for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need
conflict resolution.Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this"
means "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution") This used to be true
long time ago but current stable versions of Pgpool-II do not support
this any more.Attached patch fixes these.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Attachments:
high-availability.difftext/x-patch; charset=us-asciiDownload+2-3
Oops. Forgot to attach the patch.
In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row
for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need
conflict resolution.Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this"
means "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution") This used to be true
long time ago but current stable versions of Pgpool-II do not support
this any more.Attached patch fixes these.
If there's no objection, I am going to commit this.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 04:02:25PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Oops. Forgot to attach the patch.
In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row
for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need
conflict resolution.Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this"
means "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution") This used to be true
long time ago but current stable versions of Pgpool-II do not support
this any more.Attached patch fixes these.
If there's no objection, I am going to commit this.
+1
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 04:02:25PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Oops. Forgot to attach the patch.
In the table no bull mark is in "No conflict resolution necessary" row
for pgpool-II. Actually this is wrong. Pgpool-II does not need
conflict resolution.Also in the same page "Pgpool-II has this capability." (here "this"
means "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution") This used to be true
long time ago but current stable versions of Pgpool-II do not support
this any more.Attached patch fixes these.
If there's no objection, I am going to commit this.
+1
Fix pushed to all supported branches. Thanks!
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp