sharp or fuzzy checkpoint?
I'm interested in point-in-time-recovery (or archive recovery) too.
I'm wondering current implementation of CHECKPOINT is whether "SHARP"
or "FUZZY" checkopint. If it's a "SHARP" one, it would be a serious
performance bottle neck according to the Gray's transaction book. Does
anybody know anything about that?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I'm interested in point-in-time-recovery (or archive recovery) too.
I'm wondering current implementation of CHECKPOINT is whether "SHARP"
or "FUZZY" checkopint. If it's a "SHARP" one, it would be a serious
performance bottle neck according to the Gray's transaction book. Does
anybody know anything about that?
We have a FUZZY checkpoint because we continue processing during
the checkpoint period. In fact, we can add WAL files during the
checkpoint activity.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026