| Replied (other) | Needless additional partition check in INSERT? | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (own) | Fix obsolete comment | about 8 years ago |
| Started threadFirst patch | Fix obsolete comment | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other)Follow-up patch | Needless additional partition check in INSERT? | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Needless additional partition check in INSERT? | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | why partition pruning doesn't work? | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other)First patch | BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | why partition pruning doesn't work? | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | why partition pruning doesn't work? | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning | about 8 years ago |
| Replied (other) | Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported | about 8 years ago |